Aspetti filologico di nuovo dell’ideologia senecana, Testi ancora manuali verso l’insegnamento universitario del latino 68, Bologna: Patron 2000

Verso. Setaioli, “Interpretazioni stoiche di nuovo epicuree durante Servio e la preparazione dell’esegesi filosofica del saga e dei poeti per Roma (Cornuto, Seneca, Filodemo)”, I–II,International Journal of the Classical Tradition 10, 2003–2004, 335–376; 11, 2004–2005, 3–46.

Per. Setaioli, “Le fragment II Soubiran duDe consulatu de Ciceron, leDe diuinatione et leur lecture par Virgile”, in:Signe et prediction dans l’Antiquite. Actes du Discussion international interdisciplinaire de Creteil et de Paris (22–23–24 in nessun caso 2003). Textes reunis par Jose Kany-Turpin, Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Universite de Saint-Etienne 2005, 241–261.

Ed. Merli, “Epigrammzyklen und ‘serielle Lekture’ per den Buchern Martials: Uberlegungen und Beispiele,” sopra F

W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1952 (reprint: ibid. W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1990).

P. Steinmetz, “Allegorische Deutung und allegorische Dichtung in der alten Stoa”,Rheinisches Museum fur Philologie N.F. 129, 1986, 18–30 (ristampato in: Come sopra, P. Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, di nuovo. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).

References

The ‘conferenceacta’ comprise seven papers that are meant to document the direction(s) per which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) con the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published sopra the most recent tomo of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).

Edmunds (above, n. 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up sicuro the reader puro discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds’ (and, of course, others’) elite notion of ‘interpretation’ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on verso par with its ‘traditional’ sense, “puro expound the meaning of [something]; esatto render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; esatto elucidate; preciso explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).

Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made a wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning preciso verso commentary on verso collection of poetry.

For a theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism durante the age of the electronic mezzi di comunicazione,” in: G. W. Most (di nuovo.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).

Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include E. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), puro name but per few.

W., at 283–284, gives a list of the most important editions and commentaries, puro which one might want preciso add Per. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis e Militare: il cadenza del analisi V amor en linea sito di incontri, Scaffale di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is per valuable supplement onesto P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. Damschen and Per. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late sicuro be included sopra W.’s bibliography.

The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant preciso be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography mediante Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late sicuro be included in W.’s bibliography 401–490.

For verso useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (addirittura.),Toto notus sopra orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.